|
Title: CAN LIVED EXPERIENCE CONSTITUTE A RELIABLE SOURCE OF HISTORY? |
Authors: Kipouropoulou Georgia |
Abstract: Historians have at times expressed doubts concerning the credibility of of memory itself, the
psychology of the relationship between the interviewer and the narrator during the interview, and
generally the relationship between memory and history. There is a complex relationship between
narration, time and memory. Narration is a lived experience of the past while, at the same time, it
provides ways so that people can perceive the present. Oral history has also been described as
“the interview of witnesses who participated in the events of the past, with the aim of
reconstructing the past”. For many and various reasons, historiography has suppressed or
forgotten or neglected or deliberately avoided historical facts which can be retrieved through oral
history. The research of oral history does not aim at collecting information about certain events
but rather looks for the subjective experience of the event that took place. He is not only
interested in what happened, but also in how narrators experienced it. Historians are reserved
towards oral accounts as the narration itself is a product of memory. The historian, as a subject of
the historical speech, respects the objective existence of historical events
|
PDF Download |
|
|